You are using an outdated browser. We suggest you update your browser for a better experience. Click here for update.
Close this notification.
Skip to main content Skip to search
Ontario Cancer Facts

Less material resources associated with higher cancer incidence

Oct 2022

 

  • Higher material deprivation was associated with overall higher cancer incidence in Ontario.
  • Some cancers showed more pronounced incidence rate trends linked to material deprivation than others.
  • Material deprivation is an important consideration for the development of cancer prevention strategies.

 

From 2010 to 2016, the incidence rate for all cancers combined in Ontario was higher in regions with higher material deprivation than in the least materially deprived regions. Material deprivation means individuals and communities are unable to access and attain basic material needs. The most deprived regions had an overall 12% higher cancer incidence rate compared with the least deprived (data not shown).

This overall trend was driven by some cancers more than others. Incidence rates for lung and colorectal cancers rose as material deprivation increased. Lung cancer incidence rates were 80% higher and colorectal cancer rates were 18% higher in the most materially deprived regions than in the least deprived regions. However, breast and prostate cancer incidence rates decreased as material deprivation increased. The figure highlights these four common cancers and shows the differences in cancer incidence rates in regions with the least (Q1) to the most (Q5) material deprivation.

Cancer incidence rates by material deprivation quintile and cancer type, 2010 to 2016 combined

 

 

Analysis by: Population Health and Prevention, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario)
Source: Ontario Cancer Registry (2021), Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario)
Notes:Rates are per 100,000 and standardized to the age distribution of the 2011 Canadian population.
I represents 95% confidence intervals.
* represents a rate that is significantly different than the rate for Q1 (least deprived) for each cancer type (p less than 0.05).
Q1 to Q5 represent regions of Ontario categorized into quintiles from the least deprived (Q1) to the most deprived (Q5).

 

 

Analysis by: Population Health and Prevention, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario)
Source: Ontario Cancer Registry (2021), Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario)
Notes:Rates are per 100,000 and standardized to the age distribution of the 2011 Canadian population.
I represents 95% confidence intervals.
* represents a rate that is significantly different than the rate for Q1 (least deprived) for each cancer type (p less than 0.05).
Q1 to Q5 represent regions of Ontario categorized into quintiles from the least deprived (Q1) to the most deprived (Q5).

 

 

Analysis by: Population Health and Prevention, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario)
Source: Ontario Cancer Registry (2021), Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario)
Notes:Rates are per 100,000 and standardized to the age distribution of the 2011 Canadian population.
I represents 95% confidence intervals.
* represents a rate that is significantly different than the rate for Q1 (least deprived) for each cancer type (p less than 0.05).
Q1 to Q5 represent regions of Ontario categorized into quintiles from the least deprived (Q1) to the most deprived (Q5).

 

 

Analysis by: Population Health and Prevention, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario)
Source: Ontario Cancer Registry (2021), Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario)
Notes:Rates are per 100,000 and standardized to the age distribution of the 2011 Canadian population.
I represents 95% confidence intervals.
* represents a rate that is significantly different than the rate for Q1 (least deprived) for each cancer type (p less than 0.05).
Q1 to Q5 represent regions of Ontario categorized into quintiles from the least deprived (Q1) to the most deprived (Q5).

Cancer incidence rates by material deprivation quintile and cancer type, 2010 to 2016 combined
Cancer type Material deprivation quintile Incidence rate 95% lower confidence limit 95% upper confidence limit
Colorectal Q1 50.39 49.46 51.34
Colorectal Q2 54.44* 53.45 55.44
Colorectal Q3 57.99* 56.94 59.06
Colorectal Q4 59.79* 58.71 60.88
Colorectal Q5 60.99* 59.87 62.12
Lung Q1 46.19 45.30 47.09
Lung Q2 53.13* 52.17 54.11
Lung Q3 61.25* 60.18 62.33
Lung Q4 69.02* 67.88 70.18
Lung Q5 83.37* 82.07 84.68
Breast Q1 73.50 72.36 74.64
Breast Q2 71.94 70.80 73.10
Breast Q3 74.08 72.87 75.31
Breast Q4 73.89 72.65 75.14
Breast Q5 70.89* 69.66 72.14
Prostate Q1 58.88 57.88 59.89
Prostate Q2 57.52 56.52 58.53
Prostate Q3 55.95* 54.93 56.98
Prostate Q4 54.94* 53.92 55.98
Prostate Q5 50.92* 49.90 51.94

Analysis by: Population Health and Prevention, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario)
Source: Ontario Cancer Registry (2021), Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario)
Notes:Rates are per 100,000 and standardized to the age distribution of the 2011 Canadian population.
I represents 95% confidence intervals.
* represents a rate that is significantly different than the rate for Q1 (least deprived) for each cancer type (p less than 0.05).
Q1 to Q5 represent regions of Ontario categorized into quintiles from the least deprived (Q1) to the most deprived (Q5).

Material deprivation is one of the 4 dimensions of the Ontario Marginalization Index (ON-Marg). This area-based index measures multiple dimensions of marginalization in Ontario at the neighbourhood level. The material deprivation dimension incorporates income, education, quality of housing and family structure. Indicators for this dimension measure the proportion of the population who are without a high school diploma, single-parent families, receiving government transfers, unemployed, low-income and living in poor housing conditions. Regions of Ontario are categorized into quintiles from the least deprived (Q1) to the most deprived (Q5). The other 3 dimensions of ON-Marg are residential instability, dependency and ethnic concentration.

Because the social determinants of health are often related, multi-dimensional indices, such as ON-Marg, have been developed to examine the impact of their intersection on health outcomes in Ontario. The 2016 version of ON-Marg, created by Public Health Ontario and the Centre for Urban Health Solutions at St. Michael’s Hospital, groups data from the 2016 census across four dimensions of marginalization. Each dimension is provided in quintiles and at multiple levels of geography, including dissemination area. There are some limitations to using ON-Marg; for example, area-level marginalization may not reflect individual-level marginalization and the use of a composite index means the impact of each individual indicator cannot be determined.

Associating ON-Marg data with regional cancer incidence data provides a novel opportunity to identify associations between different dimensions of marginalization and cancer outcomes. Understanding these associations can be critical for policy and program specialists planning cancer prevention strategies to improve the health of the population.

For more information about ON-Marg, visit Ontario Marginalization Index

If you have comments or questions, please send us an email.

References

  1. Matheson FI, Moloney G, van Ingen T; Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion (Public Health Ontario). 2016 Ontario marginalization index: user guide. 1st revision. Toronto, ON: St. Michael’s Hospital (Unity Health Toronto); 2022. Joint publication with Public Health Ontario.
  2. Zygmunt A, Tanuseputro P, James P, Lima I, Tuna M, Kendall CE. Neighbourhood-level marginalization and avoidable mortality in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study. Can J Public Health. 2020 Apr;111(2):169-181.